Standard Diagnostic Methods
General data
Course ID: | 2500-EN-O-56 |
Erasmus code / ISCED: |
14.4
|
Course title: | Standard Diagnostic Methods |
Name in Polish: | Standard Diagnostic Methods |
Organizational unit: | Faculty of Psychology |
Course groups: |
obligatory courses for 2 year |
ECTS credit allocation (and other scores): |
(not available)
|
Language: | English |
Type of course: | obligatory courses |
Short description: |
The course provides an introduction to using and interpreting standardized diagnostic methods. |
Full description: |
The aim of the course is to introduce students to basic types of standardized diagnostic methods, e.g. verbal and non-verbal intelligence tests; temperamental and personality inventories and other essential methods for psychological diagnosis. Several primary themes will be presented during the classes: basic psychometric properties of tests, ethical aspects of diagnostic process, intelligence assessment, personality assessment, coping styles assessment, temperament assessment. The course will place emphasis on practice in order to equip students with skills needed to make diagnosis. Students will learn how to refer to the test manual, how to apply tests to the psychological practice, how to calculate and interpret the results, how to give an objective and neutral feedback. |
Bibliography: |
1. Introduction. Psychological testing basic issues. and bibliography Course program and requirements Diagnosis details Get to know each other – quiz - What is a psychological test? Test properties. How to assess the quality and psychometric properties of tests? Reading: Domino, G., Domino M.L. (2006), Psychological Testing, An Introduction, chapter 1 2. Ethical issues regarding assessment and diagnosis Reading: Http://www.apa.org/ethics/code2002.pdf Optional: Hogan T.P. (2003) Psychological Testing. A practical introduction, John Wiley & Sons, INC, chapter 16 3. Test as a tool in psychological practice Informed consent and establishing rapport. Administration and scoring. Behavioral observations. Feedback. Reading: Domino, G., Domino M.L. (2006), Psychological Testing, An Introduction, chapter 2,3 Lichtenberger, E.O., Mather, N., Kaufman, N.L., Kaufman, A.S., (2004) Essentials of assessment report writing, New York: Wiley, 55-81. 4. Intelligence 1 Theories of intelligence Intelligence and Achievements Tests Reading: Das J.P. Theories of intelligence: Issues and Applications (2004), [in] (eds.) G. Goldstein, S.R. Beers, Comprehensive handbook of Psychological Assessment, John Wiley & Sons, INC. Kaufman, J. C., Kaufman, S. B., & Plucker, J. A. (2013). Contemporary theories of intelligence. The oxford handbook of cognitive psychology, 811-822. 5. Intelligence 2 One dimension intelligence scale (Raven). Self-diagnosis (Raven). 6. Intelligence 3 Administration procedure Scoring and Interpreting About the report from Raven project. Reading: Raven, J., Raven J.C., Court J.H. (1998) Raven Manual: Section 1, Harcourt, G4-G15 Raven, J., Raven J.C., Court J.H. (2000) Raven Manual: Section 3, Harcourt, SPM54-SPM75 Raven, J., Raven J.C., Court J.H. (1998) Raven Manual: Section 1, Harcourt Raven, J., Raven J.C., Court J.H. (2000) Raven Manual: Section 3, Harcourt 7. Intelligence 4 Complex intelligence scales - WAIS-III and WISC-III Reading: Zhu J., Weiss L.G., Prifitera A., Coalson D. (2004), The Wechsler Intelligence Scales for Children and Adults. [in] (eds.) G. Goldstein, S.R. Beers, Comprehensive handbook of Psychological Assessment, John Wiley & Sons, INC. 8. Multi scale personality tests About personality tests Scale construction Different answer scales Reading: Domino, G., Domino M.L. (2006), Psychological Testing, An Introduction, chapter 4. 9. NEO-PR I Self-diagnosis (NEO-PR). About NEO-PR administration Profile interpretation 10. NEO-PR II NEO-PR interpretation - practice Using Validity data in interpreting test scores. About the NEO-PR project Reading: Costa, P.T., McCrae R.R (1992), NEO-PI-R Professional Manual, PAR 11. Coping Inventory for Stressful Situations CISS Different stress-coping styles. Self-diagnosis (CISS) Interpretation About the CISS project Reading: Parker, J. D. A., Endler, N. (1999). Coping Inventory for Stressful Situations. Manual. Pearson. |
Learning outcomes: |
Once this course is completed, students are expected to be able to: Be thoroughly familiar with basic psychometric concepts and formulas and be able to evaluate the psychometric characteristics of any published psychological test. Be familiar with the various ethical and professional issues related to psychological assessment. Demonstrate the ability of professional administration, scoring, interpretation and reporting of selected tests. Demonstrate the skills of giving the neutral and objective feedback. Use Library & Internet sources in acquiring of information about psychological tests. |
Assessment methods and assessment criteria: |
1. Diagnosis: 60% of final grade The main project in this course is to conduct an individual assessment based on three psychological tests. The reports you will write are a case study using standard methods. Your goal is to find one young person (end of high school beginning of college) willing to participate in three test sessions. The overarching aim of your diagnosis is creating a basis for advising them in a transition period (changing school, choosing new directions in life). Diagnosis means you will need to prepare three technical and one final report: • Technical Reports Three two short reports from assessments are worth 30% of your grade each. Technical reports should consist of a description of the subject, administration of the test, the test score and brief interpretation. Knowledge from our classes and obligatory literature will help you in this exercise. These reports should be approximately 2-4 pages (Raven, NEO-P-R, CISS) • Final Report A final report will be worth 20% of your grade. The final report is a compilation of the three technical, enriched with an interpretation of broad functioning, this should serve as an overall assessment of your testing subject. You will receive structure and guidelines concerning the final report. Final report – 7-8 pages (excluding appendixes such as filled test forms and score tables). 2. Test Critique Project (assignment in pairs) 10% of final grade You will be assigned to pairs of 2 people. We will provide list of test available in LTD. Once you have selected a test, you will need to contact the LTD, obtain a copy (along with any manuals, pilot studies and/or reliability and validity data available) and complete a literature search to find studies conducted using this test in other settings. Based on your understanding of these materials, you will have to prepare a brief presentation in class (15- minute presentation). Guiding questions: • What is the test designed for? • How was it created and normed? • Would you use it? Why or why not? If so, for what purpose(s)? • Does it appear to be adequately constructed? • Does it appear to be adequately normed? • Is reliability and validity established? • Do other test to measure the same thing exist? Finally you will need to summarize the theoretical framework upon which the test you selected is based and indicate the population for which it is designed to be used. 3. Final test 30% of final grade There will be open-ended questions concerning general testing issues discussed during classes (they may refer to both practical and theoretical issues). Notice 1: In the final report any scoring mistakes will not be accepted. Use feedback from technical reports to create a final report without mistakes. Scoring mistakes will automatically earn you a zero for the final report. Notice 2: Term “Deadline” refers to beginning of the class. Notice 3: We expect hard (printed) copy of each paper (hard copy printed on white A4 format paper, Font 12, Times New Roman, double spaced) with all appendixes (test answer sheets, profile forms etc.). We also ask for electronic version of your work sent by e-mail. Notice 4: The deadlines for reports are non-negotiable. Late report will be accepted but your score will be reduced by 50%. It is your responsibility to backup your computer, make backup copies of your work, arrange with your brother access to his printer, book tickets to earlier flight from Bermuda and do all the necessary steps in order to ensure that you attend classes and you do not lose your paper right before it is due. Notice 6: The paper is to be the product of independent work. Plagiarism is unacceptable and will result in an automatic FAILURE. Notice 7: rewriting of final report is possible only for those who scored below 50% of points (failed). Notice 8: rewriting of the final exam is possible only for those who scored below 50% of points (failed). Grading and passing In order to pass the course the requirements are: Passing final test (min. 16 points) Passing the final report (min. 16 points) Completing all class assignments Getting min. 60 points from all the activities Grading: Technical report no. 1 (Raven) - 10% (10 points) Technical report no. 2 (NEO-P-R) – 10% (10 points) Technical report no. 3 (CISS) - 10% (10 points) Final report (overall diagnosis) - 30% (30 points) Test critique project - 10% (10 points) Final test - 30% (30 points) You can get a maximum of 100 points from all the activities described above. Your final grade depends on the total number of points gained. 0-59 points = 2 (not passing) 60-67 points = 3 68 – 75 points = 3,5 76 – 83 points = 4 84 – 91 points = 4,5 92 – 99 points = 5 100 points = 5! Attendance rules No more than 2 classes can be missed, irrespective of excuse |
Copyright by University of Warsaw.