Animal Consciousness
General data
Course ID: | 2500-EN-F-210 |
Erasmus code / ISCED: |
14.4
|
Course title: | Animal Consciousness |
Name in Polish: | Animal Consciousness |
Organizational unit: | Faculty of Psychology |
Course groups: |
(in Polish) Academic basket (in Polish) electives for 2,3,4 and 5 year Biological Bases of Behavior basket |
ECTS credit allocation (and other scores): |
(not available)
|
Language: | English |
Type of course: | elective courses |
Requirements: | Biological Bases of Behavior 2500-EN_O_05 |
Short description: |
n Animal consciousness remains an elusive and controversial phenomenon. From the Darwinian point of view, consciousness is a product of long lasting evolutionary process. In the course of our meetings, we will travel across various approaches, theories and research papers, in order to figure out the contemporary views, controversies and proven facts, about the development, and evolution of various forms of animal consciousness. |
Full description: |
Animal consciousness remains an elusive and controversial phenomenon. It is debated by philosophers, psychologists, and more recently by evolutionary biologists. From the Darwinian point of view, consciousness is a product of long lasting evolutionary process. In the course of our meetings, we will travel across various approaches, theories and research papers, in order to figure out the contemporary views, controversies and proven facts, about the development, and evolution of various forms of animal consciousness. |
Bibliography: |
* Bayne, T., Hohwy, J., & Owen, A. M. (2016). Are There Levels of Consciousness? Trends in Cognitive Sciences, xx, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2016.03.009 * Earl, B. (2014). The biological function of consciousness. Frontiers in Psychology, 5(August), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00697 * Feinberg, T. E., & Mallatt, J. (2016). The nature of primary consciousness. A new synthesis. Consciousness and Cognition, 43, 113–127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2016.05.009 * Grinde, B. (2012). The Evolutionary Rationale for Consciousness. Biological Theory, 7(3), 227–236. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13752-012-0061-3 * Harley, H. E. (2013). Consciousness in dolphins? A review of recent evidence. Journal of Comparative Physiology. A, Neuroethology, Sensory, Neural, and Behavioral Physiology, 199(6), 565–82. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00359-013-0816-8 * Key, B. (2015). Fish do not feel pain and its implications for understanding phenomenal consciousness. Biology and Philosophy, 30(2), 149–165. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10539- 014-9469-4 * Morin, A. (2006). Levels of consciousness and self-awareness: A comparison and integration of various neurocognitive views. Consciousness and Cognition, 15(2), 358–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2005.09.006 * Natsoulas, T. (1978). Consciousness. American Psychologist, OCT(October), 906–914. * Natsoulas, T. (1983). Concepts of Consciousness. Journal of Mind and Behavior, 4(1), 13–59. * Pisula, W. (2016). Levels of Consciousness. Open Journal of Philosophy, 6(1), 51–58. https://doi.org/10.4236/ojpp.2016.61006 Block, N. (2007). Consciousness, accessibility, and the mesh between psychology and neuroscience. The Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 30(5–6), 481–548. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X07002786 Blumenfeld, H. (2016). Neuroanatomical basis of Consciousness. In The Neurology of Conciousness (pp. 3–29). Elsevier Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-800948-2.00001-7 Edelman, G. M., Gally, J. A., & Baars, B. J. (2011). Biology of consciousness. Frontiers in Psychology, 2, 4. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00004 Gross, M. (2013). Elements of consciousness in animals. Current Biology, 23(22), R981–R983. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2013.10.078 Helminian, D. (2015). Clarifying the conception of consciousness: Lonergan, Chalmers, and confounded epistemology. Dialogues in Philosophy, Mental and Neuro Sciences, 8(2), 59–74. Henke, K., Reber, T. P., & Duss, S. B. (2013). Integrating events across levels of consciousness. Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience, 7(June), 68. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnbeh.2013.00068 Meacham, B. (2016). Don’t Say “Consciousness”: Toward a Uniform Vocabulary of Subjectivity. Sociology and Anthropology, 4(12), 1099–1107. https://doi.org/10.13189/sa.2016.041209 Meyer, R. E. (2015). Physiologic measures of animal stress during transitional states of consciousness. Animals, 5(3), 702–716. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani5030380 Navajas, J., Rey, H. G., & Quian Quiroga, R. (2014). Perceptual and contextual awareness: methodological considerations in the search for the neural correlates of consciousness. Frontiers in Psychology, 5(August), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00959 Panksepp, J. (2010). Affective consciousness in animals: perspectives on dimensional and primary process emotion approaches. Proceedings. Biological Sciences / The Royal Society, 277(1696), 2905–7. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2010.1017 Paulson, S., Chalmers, D., Kahneman, D., Santos, L., & Schiff, N. (2013). The thinking ape: the enigma of human consciousness. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1303(1), 4–23; discussion 24. https://doi.org/10.1111/nyas.12165 Wilber, K. (1979). A developmental view of consciousness. Journal of Transpersonal Psychology, 11(1), 1–21. Zeki, S. (2003). The disunity of consciousness. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 7(5), 214–218. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1364-6613(03)00081-0 Zeman, A., & Coebergh, J. A. (2013). The nature of consciousness. In J. Bernat & R. Beresford (Eds.), Handbook of Clinical Neurology, vol. 118, (3rd series). Ethical and Legal Issues in Neurology (pp. 373– 406). Elsevier B.V. |
Learning outcomes: |
Knowledge: students will learn about the main approaches to the problem of animal consciousness, especially these originating from empirical sciences |
Assessment methods and assessment criteria: |
One class may be missed without excuse. Further absences are permitted only with a formal excuse. More than 3 absence result in course failure. Assessment is based on a short paper and a written exam at the end of the course. The exam makes up 50% of the final grade and the paper the other 50%. The exam consists of two open questions on the readings from the list marked as important with an "*". The answers are supposed not to exceed 150 words. |
Copyright by University of Warsaw.