Culture and Psychopathology: Cross-Cultural Perspectives and Practice
Informacje ogólne
Kod przedmiotu: | 2500-EN-S-142 |
Kod Erasmus / ISCED: |
14.4
|
Nazwa przedmiotu: | Culture and Psychopathology: Cross-Cultural Perspectives and Practice |
Jednostka: | Wydział Psychologii |
Grupy: |
specialization courses for 5 year |
Punkty ECTS i inne: |
(brak)
|
Język prowadzenia: | angielski |
Rodzaj przedmiotu: | obowiązkowe |
Skrócony opis: |
(tylko po angielsku) This course will examine different dimensions of how Culture affects our understanding of psychology and psychopathology, and how an awareness of the influence of culture is essential to mental health treatment and psychotherapeutic practice. The chosen texts will link theory to practice, examining dominant discourses around individuality, identity, psychopathology and treatment. Relevant theoretical issues around universalism versus relativism, colonialism and otherness, power, difference and racism will be explored. Students will be encouraged and supported to examine the values and discourses informing their own perspectives. |
Pełny opis: |
(tylko po angielsku) Each week students will be required to familiarize themselves with two chosen texts, and contribute to a discussion of the ideas explored in each seminar topic. Classes will involve student presentations, close critical reading of the texts, and structured discussion. The texts will bridge social science theory and clinical practice. Students will be able to explore particular topics in more depth through their presentation and essay, and the weekly reflective log will offer a context in which students can reflect on the personal impact of texts and the ideas encountered. This Seminar course requires a commitment to reading the assigned materials. This course aims to increase our awareness around the topics covered through open-minded study and lively discussion. We will aim to cultivate a climate of respectful listening and curiosity, sensitive challenge, and personal reflection. Students should be willing to critically reflect on the values and discourses informing their own perspectives and respect those of others. In the Seminars and assessed work, students will be invited to demonstrate a capacity to reflect on these values and discourses, in accordance with the topics and materials studied. We will aim to be particularly attentive to matters of equality, diversity, privilege and difference, and participants will be encouraged to reflect on how they themselves contribute to the group learning experience. 2 ECTS (total 60hrs) - Class Attendance: 15hrs - 10min Presentation: 2hrs preparation - Reading 28hrs (4hrs/Seminar) - Essay 15hrs (The Reflective Learning Log has no hours allocation as it is to be completed as part of the process of reflection alongside the other elements of the course, e.g. whilst reading and in response to the seminar sessions). |
Literatura: |
(tylko po angielsku) 1. Introduction to the course (45mins). In this short introductory class the expectations and format will be established, and students will be asked to choose a paper to present in one of the subsequent Seminars. A working understanding of the concepts of discourse, power and constructions of identity will also be established. - Hall, S. (1997), Foucault: Power, Knowledge and Discourse, in S. Hall (ed.) Representation: Cultural Representation and Signifying Practices, London: Sage. 2. Constructions of the Other - Wilkinson, S. & Kitzinger, C. (1996). Theorizing Representing the Other pp. 1-32 in Representing the Other: A Feminism and Psychology Reader, London: Sage. - Hall, S. (1997) The Spectacle of the ‘Other’, in S. Hall (ed.) Representation: Cultural Representation and Signifying Practices, London: Sage. 3. Race and Racism - Fanon, F. (1952), The Negro and Psychopathology, pp.109- 162 in Black Skin, White Masks (1986), London: Pluto Press. - Rustin, M. (1991) Psychoanalysis, racism and anti-racism, in M. Rustin, The Good Society and the Inner World, pp.57-84 London: Verso. 4. Stereotypes and Prejudice - Bertrando, P. (2012) Cultural and family ethos in systemic therapy. In I.B.Krause (Ed.), Culture and Reflexivity in Systemic Psychotherapy: Mutual Perspectives, (pp.115-137). London: Karnac. - Bhabha, H. K. (1994) The Other Question: Stereotype, discrimination and the discourse of colonialism, pp. 94-120 in The Location of Culture, London: Routledge. 5. Culture & Attachment - Krause, I. B. (2002) Culture. In I. B. Krause, Culture and System in Family Therapy, p.17-24, London: Karnac. - Rothbaum, F. & Morelli, G. (2005). Attachment and culture: bridging relativism and universalism. In: Friedlmeier, W. et al, eds. Culture and Development. The importance of cross cultural research for the social sciences. pp.99-123, Hove: Psychology Press 6. Kinship and Genograms - Hardy, K. V. & Laszloffy T. A. (1995) The Cultural Genogram: Key to training culturally competent family therapists. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 21 (3), 227-237. - Watts-Jones, D. (1997), Towards an African-American Genogram. Family Process 36(4): 375-383 7. Refugees and Violence - James, K. (2010) Domestic Violence Within Refugee Families: Intersecting Patriarchal Culture and the Refugee Experience. In The Australian and New Zealand Journal of Famiy Therapy Volume 31, Number 3, pp.275-284. - De Haene, L. & Rober, P. (2016), Looking for a Home: An exploration of Jacques Derrida’s notion of hospitality in family therapy practice with refugees. In Systemic Therapy as Trnsformative Practice (2016) Ed. Imelda McCarthy and Gail Simon, pp.94-110, Farnhill: Everything is Connected Press. 8. Cultural Reflexivity - Krause, I.-B. (2012). Culture and the reflexive subject in systemic psychotherapy. In I.B.Krause (Ed.), Culture and Reflexivity in Systemic Psychotherapy: Mutual Perspectives, (pp.1-35). London: Karnac. - Gorell Barnes, G. (2002), Getting it right, getting it wrong: developing an internal discourse about ethnicity and difference, pp.133-147 in Exploring the Unsaid: Creativity, Risks and Dilemmas in working Cross-Culturally (Ed. Mason, B. & Sawyer, S.), London: Karnac. |
Efekty uczenia się: |
(tylko po angielsku) Learning outcomes Critical thinking; an introductory understanding of the far-reaching influence of culture on psychology as a discipline and how psychopathology is understood; treatment and practice implications of cultural factors; an insight into some of the intersections between Psychology, Sociology, and Anthropology; self-reflexivity, i.e. a developing awareness of how factors such as culture, race, gender and our own specific contexts may affect how we think, perceive, and are perceived by those around us. |
Metody i kryteria oceniania: |
(tylko po angielsku) Assessment Written Essay, 2,500 words - 50% Choice of 1 of 2-3 questions inviting exploration of one of the topics covered and the implications for psychology, psychopathology, mental health, and psychotherapy. The essay will require students to explore a given topic in more depth and situate the ideas in the wider landscape of psychology and psychopathology. Students will be invited to demonstrate a reflective capacity regarding how their own personal context may influence their perspective. Classroom Presentation - 20% Maximum 10 minute presentation in pairs exploring the issues covered in one of the papers from the weekly topics, and offering up some points or questions for class discussion. Students will be asked to provide fellow class members with a summary sheet to accompany their presentation, including questions for discussion. Students will be assessed for critical evaluation of the material, their consideration of potential implications for how we think about psychopathology, and how thoughtfully they frame the points for discussion. Classroom Participation – 10% Classroom participation will be assessed for level of engagement with the material and for showing sensitivity regarding power and difference. This means developing an awareness of how one’s own contributions to the seminar influence the overall learning experience. Students should be mindful of voice entitlement and aim to foster equality of voice in the seminars so that there is an opportunity for everyone’s perspective to be heard, as well as expressing their own. Discussion questions and group exercises will promote this. Reflective Learning Log – 20% The reflective learning log is an informal collection of personal reflections on the material covered and the experience of participating in the seminar course. It is not assessed according to length or formal presentation, but should be maintained throughout the duration of the course and demonstrate a level of personal engagement with the topics covered, as well as some reflections on students’ personal responses to them. Guideline length – 1 side of printed notes for each topic/seminar. Attendance rules Absence maximum: 2 sessions, at least 1 of which must be sup |
Właścicielem praw autorskich jest Uniwersytet Warszawski.