Animation of culture

obligatory courses

To acquaint students with the most important issues related to culture animation and preparation for independent planning of animation activities.

The student should have knowledge of theoretical issues related to culture animation and have the ability to independently plan animation activities

Classroom

During the classes, the most important issues related to cultural animation will be discussed.

The most important issues related to culture animation will be discussed during the classes. We will deal with both the theoretical side - reflection on the concept itself, the reflection it evokes, the definition of the field of animation activities, as well as the practical side - we will look at the activities that animate Ukrainian culture and learn the mechanisms needed to independently design an animation activity.

Student workload:

contact hours (in the room) 30 hours - 1 ECTS

preparation for classes 15 hours - 0.5 ECTS

preparation for passing 15 hours - 0.5 ECTS

Godlewski G., Kurz I., Mencwel A., Wójtowski M., Animacja kultury. Doświadzenie I przyszłość, Warszawa 2002.

Gwóźdź A., Nieracka-Ćwikiel A., Media, ciało, pamięć. O współczesnych tożsamościach kulturowych, Warszawa 2006.

K. Sekutowicz, Monitorowanie i ewaluacja, w: praca zbiorowa, Wiedza i doświadczenie, Zarządzanie, planowanie i ocenia własnych działań, moduł 1, ss. 57-82, Akademia Rozwoju Filantropii w Polsce, Warszawa, 2006

B. Idzikowski, Wyznaczniki ról zawodowych animatorów kultury, [w:] J. Żebrowski (red.), Animacja kulturalna i społeczno-wychowawcza w środowiskach lokalnych, Gdańskie Towarzystwo Naukowe, Gdańsk 2003

K. Burakowska, O animacji kulturalnej i animatorach. Refleksje praktyka (głos w dyskusji), [w:] J. Żebrowski (red.), Animacja kulturalna i społeczno-wychowawcza w środowiskach lokalnych, Gdańskie Towarzystwo Naukowe, Gdańsk 2003

M. Grabowska, T. Szawiel, Budowanie demokracji, rozdział 3: Społeczeństwo obywatelskie, punkt Społeczeństwo obywatelskie a kapitał społeczny, s. 131-134.

D. Głażewska, T. Schimanek, B. Tokarz (red.), Fundraising to sztuka, której można się nauczyć, Akademia Rozwoju Filantropii w Polsce, Warszawa 2005.

Projekty kulturalne - krok po kroku, Urząd Komitetu Integracji Europejskiej i Narodowe Centrum Kultury, Warszawa 2004

Łuszczek M., Ptasińska U., Jak przetworzyć miejsce. Podręcznik kreowania przestrzeni publicznych, Warszawa 2009.

Pacholak K., Podaj dalej. 100 pomysłów Młodych Menedżerów Kultury, Warszawa 2010

Białek-Graczyk M., Inspiracja – aktywacja, Warszawa 2004.

Latoch-Zielińska, Animacja działan kulturalnych. Wyzwania współczesności, Warszawa 2010.

Jedlewska B., Skrzypczak B., Dom kultury XXI wieku – wizje niepokoje, rozwiązania, Warszawa 2009.

D. Lalak, Badania aktywizujące; S. Kawula, Diagnoza społeczna, (w:) D. Lalak, T. Pilch, Elementarne pojęcia pedagogiki społecznej i pracy socjalnej, Żak, Warszawa 1999.

After completing the course student / student:

- knows and understands, to an advanced extent, the link between the history of literature and the history of Ukraine and the history of culture, and the linking of these sciences with other sciences, including the history of philosophy (S1_W03)

- knows and understands the principles of functioning of Ukrainian institutions in the field of culture, politics, economy and social life (S1_W06)

- can search, analyze, evaluate, select and use information about Ukrainian culture from the earliest times to the present with the use of various sources and methods (S1_U01)

- can communicate using various channels and communication techniques with specialists in the field of Ukrainian literary and cultural studies (S1_U06)

- can plan and organize individual and team work (S1_U10)

- can independently plan and implement their own lifelong learning (S1_U11)

- is ready to recognize the importance of knowledge in solving cognitive and practical problems (S1_K02)

methods of verification of learning outcomes:

individual project 40%

group project 40%

control of the current preparation of 20%

Completion of the subject in the form of an animation project. The evaluation criteria are presented in the form of percentage thresholds:

60% - 68% - 3 (satisfactory)

69% - 77% - 3+ (rated satisfactory plus)

78% - 86% - 4 (good)

87% - 95% - 4+ (good plus)

96% - 98% - 5 (very good)

99% -100% - 5! (Very good with an exclamation mark)

The following criteria shall apply to crediting:

- achieving the assumed learning outcomes covering all relevant aspects - 5.0 (very good grade)

- achieving the assumed learning outcomes covering all relevant aspects with a small number of errors or inaccuracies - 4.5 (good plus)

- achieving the assumed learning outcomes without taking into account some (less important) aspects - 4.0 (good grade)

- achievement of the assumed learning outcomes, omitting some important aspects and with significant inaccuracies - 3.5 (satisfactory plus)

 - achievement of the assumed learning outcomes, omitting significant aspects or with serious inaccuracies - 3.0 (satisfactory plus)

- failure to achieve the expected learning outcomes - 2.0 (unsatisfactory)

The condition for admission to pass the subject / admission to the exam is attendance (in accordance with the Study Regulations at the University of Warsaw).

The student has the right to 2 unexcused absences, each subsequent one requires an explanation. The lecturer decides about the recognition of absence.

The form of passing the classes on which the student was absent is determined by the lecturer.

Exceeding absences of absence justified and unexcused for 50% of classes may be the basis for failure to credit the subject.