University of Warsaw - Central Authentication System
Strona główna

(in Polish) Logic B

General data

Course ID: 3800-ISP-L1B
Erasmus code / ISCED: 08.1 Kod klasyfikacyjny przedmiotu składa się z trzech do pięciu cyfr, przy czym trzy pierwsze oznaczają klasyfikację dziedziny wg. Listy kodów dziedzin obowiązującej w programie Socrates/Erasmus, czwarta (dotąd na ogół 0) – ewentualne uszczegółowienie informacji o dyscyplinie, piąta – stopień zaawansowania przedmiotu ustalony na podstawie roku studiów, dla którego przedmiot jest przeznaczony. / (0223) Philosophy and ethics The ISCED (International Standard Classification of Education) code has been designed by UNESCO.
Course title: (unknown)
Name in Polish: Logic B
Organizational unit: Faculty of Philosophy
Course groups: (in Polish) Przedmioty obowiązkowe, International Studies in Philosophy, studia stacjonarne, pierwszego stopnia
ECTS credit allocation (and other scores): 5.00 Basic information on ECTS credits allocation principles:
  • the annual hourly workload of the student’s work required to achieve the expected learning outcomes for a given stage is 1500-1800h, corresponding to 60 ECTS;
  • the student’s weekly hourly workload is 45 h;
  • 1 ECTS point corresponds to 25-30 hours of student work needed to achieve the assumed learning outcomes;
  • weekly student workload necessary to achieve the assumed learning outcomes allows to obtain 1.5 ECTS;
  • work required to pass the course, which has been assigned 3 ECTS, constitutes 10% of the semester student load.
Language: English
Type of course:

obligatory courses

Short description:

The class has two components: informal logic (fallacies, evaluating arguments, induction) and naïve set theory

Full description:

I. Introduction to set theory: 1. Basic concepts - set, membership relation, subset relation (inclusion), power set; 2. Algebra of sets - operations, laws, proofs; 3. Arbitrary unions and intersections; 4. Ordered pairs, Cartesian product; 5. Relations, functions, equivalence relations and ordering relations.

II. Informal methods of evaluating arguments: sentences and propositions; speech acts and conversational acts; the basic structure of arguments; a general method of argument analysis; truth, validity and soundness; usefulness of arguments; discussion of real-life examples of reasoning.

Inductive reasoning: induction, inductive generalizations; sources of bias (prejudice and stereotypes, slanted questions, informal judgmental heuristics); statistical syllogisms, reasoning about causes; necessary and sufficient conditions; problems in distinguishing sufficient conditions from necessary conditions; inferences to the best explanation, arguments from analogy.

Fallacies: the notion of fallacy; fallacies of clarity (vagueness, sorites, conceptual slippery-slope arguments, fairness slippery-slope arguments, causal slippery-slope arguments, fallacies of ambiguity, the role of definitions); fallacies of relevance (arguments ad hominem, appeals to authority); fallacies of vacuity (circular reasoning, begging the question).

Bibliography:

Barbara Partee, Mathematical Methods in Lingustics

Herbert B. Enderton, Elements of Set Theory.

Fogelin, Robert; Sinnott-Armstrong, Walter, Understanding Arguments. An Introduction to Informal Logic, Harcourt Brace College Publishers 1997.

Fisher, Alec, The Logic of Real Arguments, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 1988.

Supplementary Reading:

Thomson, Anne: Critical Reasoning, Routledge.

Walton, Douglas: Informal Logic, Cambridge University Press

Learning outcomes:

Knowledge:

The student will be made familiar with the basic concepts of set theory and will be acquainted with the informal methods of evaluating arguments. (KW05, KW06, KW09, KW10, KW11)

Skills:

The student will learn to do proofs involving set-theoretic constructs and will be warned against possible reasoning fallacies and biases. (KU05, KU07, KU10, KU16)

Social competence:

Clarity of thought and inquisitiveness. (KK02)

Assessment methods and assessment criteria:

The class ends with the final exam covering all the material at the end of the semester. Additionally there will be 3-5 minitests throughout the semester. If the student passes all these minitests, they need not take the exam and the final grade will be calculated as the average of partial results. If the student has not passed all the minitests or if they would like to get a higher grade, they have to take the final exam. In that case whatever grade they get from the final exam is their final grade.

Acceptable number of missed classes without formal explanation: 2

Classes in period "Summer semester 2023/24" (in progress)

Time span: 2024-02-19 - 2024-06-16
Selected timetable range:
Navigate to timetable
Type of class:
Tutorial, 45 hours, 30 places more information
Coordinators: Natalia Karczewska
Group instructors: Natalia Karczewska
Students list: (inaccessible to you)
Examination: Course - Examination
Tutorial - Examination

Classes in period "Summer semester 2024/25" (future)

Time span: 2025-02-17 - 2025-06-08
Selected timetable range:
Navigate to timetable
Type of class:
Tutorial, 45 hours, 45 places more information
Coordinators: Natalia Karczewska
Group instructors: Natalia Karczewska
Students list: (inaccessible to you)
Examination: Course - Examination
Tutorial - Examination
Course descriptions are protected by copyright.
Copyright by University of Warsaw.
Krakowskie Przedmieście 26/28
00-927 Warszawa
tel: +48 22 55 20 000 https://uw.edu.pl/
contact accessibility statement USOSweb 7.0.3.0 (2024-03-22)