University of Warsaw - Central Authentication System
Strona główna

The Anthropology of Ritual

General data

Course ID: 3102-FARI
Erasmus code / ISCED: 14.7 Kod klasyfikacyjny przedmiotu składa się z trzech do pięciu cyfr, przy czym trzy pierwsze oznaczają klasyfikację dziedziny wg. Listy kodów dziedzin obowiązującej w programie Socrates/Erasmus, czwarta (dotąd na ogół 0) – ewentualne uszczegółowienie informacji o dyscyplinie, piąta – stopień zaawansowania przedmiotu ustalony na podstawie roku studiów, dla którego przedmiot jest przeznaczony. / (0314) Sociology and cultural studies The ISCED (International Standard Classification of Education) code has been designed by UNESCO.
Course title: The Anthropology of Ritual
Name in Polish: The Anthropology of Ritual
Organizational unit: Institute of Ethnology and Cultural Anthropology
Course groups: (in Polish) Moduł L06 (od 2023): Religijność / świeckość / ontologie
(in Polish) Moduł L7: Antropologia symboliczna
(in Polish) Przedmioty 4EU+ (z oferty jednostek dydaktycznych)
(in Polish) Przedmioty etnograficzne do wyboru
Courses in foreign languages
ECTS credit allocation (and other scores): 5.00 Basic information on ECTS credits allocation principles:
  • the annual hourly workload of the student’s work required to achieve the expected learning outcomes for a given stage is 1500-1800h, corresponding to 60 ECTS;
  • the student’s weekly hourly workload is 45 h;
  • 1 ECTS point corresponds to 25-30 hours of student work needed to achieve the assumed learning outcomes;
  • weekly student workload necessary to achieve the assumed learning outcomes allows to obtain 1.5 ECTS;
  • work required to pass the course, which has been assigned 3 ECTS, constitutes 10% of the semester student load.
Language: English
Type of course:

optional courses

Short description:

This course analyzes the general scope of the anthropology of ritual, its main theories, approaches, and methodologies.

Full description:

The course aims to provide students with an in-depth view of the different anthropological theories of ritual, major ethnographic topics, definitional problems, and significant authors. The objective is to give students the tools to reflect critically on the importance of rituals in culture and how to approach them methodologically. The course stresses a view that conceives rituals as creating worlds that help people define and change their lives meaningfully.

Bibliography:

Archetti, Eduardo and Noel Dyck (eds). 2003. Sports, Dance and Embodied Identities, Oxford, New York, Berg.

Bloch, Maurice. 1992. Prey into Hunter. The Politics of Religious Experience. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Bloch, Maurice. 2006. “Deference” in J. Kreinath, J. Snoek, and M. Stausberg (eds.) Theorizing Rituals; Issues, Topics, Approaches, Concepts. Leiden & Boston, Brill Academic Publishers. Pp.495-506.

Durkheim, Émile. 1995. The Elementary Forms of Religious Life. London: The Free Press.

Girard, René. 1979. Violence and the Sacred. Baltimore and London: The John Hopkins University Press.

González Varela, Sergio. 2013. “Mandinga: Power and Deception in Afro-Brazilian Capoeira” in Social Analysis: The Internacional Journal of Social and Cultural Practice. Vol. 57 (2): pp. 1-20.

Goody, Jack. 1961. “Religion and Ritual: The Definitional Problem,” in British Journal of Sociology 12 Pp.142-64.

Grimes, Ronald. 2000. Deeply into the Bone: Re-Inventing Rites of Passage. Berkeley: University of California Press.

Grimes, Ronald. 2006. Rites out of Place: Ritual, Media, and the Arts. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Grotowski, Jerzy. 2002. Towards a Poor Theatre. Edited by Eugenio Barba. Preface by Peter Brook. New York: Routledge.

Handelman, Don. 2005. ” Introduction: Why Ritual in Its Own Right? How So?” in Lindquist, Galina (eds). Ritual in its own right. Exploring the dynamics of transformation. Oxford: Berghahn Books. Pp. 1-34.

Handelman, Don. 2006. “Conceptual Alternatives to ‘Ritual’” in J. Kreinath, J. Snoek, and M. Stausberg (eds.) Theorizing Rituals; Issues, Topics, Approaches, Concepts. Leiden & Boston: Brill Academic Publishers. Pp. 37-49.

Holbraad, Martin. 2008. “Definitive Evidence, From Cuban Gods,” in Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute (NS) S93-S109.

Huntington, Richard, and Metcalf, Peter (eds.). Celebrations of Death. The Anthropology of Mortuary Ritual. London: Cambridge University Press.

Hüsken, Ute (ed.). 2007. When Rituals Go Wrong: Mistakes, Failure, and the Dynamics of Ritual, Leiden/Boston: Brill.

Kapferer, Bruce. 2006. “Virtuality” in J. Kreinath, J. Snoek, and M. Stausberg (eds.) Theorizing Rituals; Issues, Topics, Approaches, Concepts, Leiden & Boston, Brill Academic Publishers. Pp. 671-684.

Kapferer, Bruce. 2007. “Sorcery and the Beautiful; A Discourse on the Esthetics of Ritual,” in Angela Hobart and Bruce Kapferer Aesthetics in Performance; Formation of Symbolic Construction and Experience. New York and Oxford: Berghahn Books. Pp. 129- 160.

Lewis, James, and Hammer, Olav (eds). 2007. The Invention of Sacred Traditions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Napier, David. 1992. Foreign Bodies: Performance, Art and Symbolic Anthropology. Berkeley: University of California Press.

Rapapport, Roy. 1979. “The Obvious Aspects of Ritual,” in Ecology Meaning and Religion. Richmond, California: North Atlantic Books. Pp. 173-222.

Schechner, Richard. 1985. Between Theatre and Anthropology, Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.

Schieffelin, Edward. 1995. “On Failure and Performance,” in Laderman, C., and Roseman, M. (eds.) The Performance of Healing, New York: Routledge, 59-90.

Snoek, Jan. 2006. “Defining ‘Rituals’” in J. Kreinath, J. Snoek, and M. Stausberg (eds.) Theorizing Rituals; Issues, Topics, Approaches, Concepts. Leiden & Boston: Brill Academic Publishers. Pp. 3- 14.

Turner, Edith. 2012. Communitas. The Anthropology of Collective Joy. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

Turner, Victor. 1969. The Ritual Process. Structure and Anti-Structure. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

Turner, Victor. 1982. From Ritual to Theatre. The Human Seriousness of Play. New York: Paj Publications.

Wagner, Roy. 1984. “Ritual as Communication: Order, Meaning, and Secrecy in Melanesian Initiation Rites”, Annual Review of Anthropology, Vol. 13, pp. 143-155.

Learning outcomes:

At the end of the course, students will identify the main anthropological approaches to studying rituals. They will learn how to describe rituals ethnographically and will

know the different methodologies to do so. Students will assess the importance of ritual practice in society and its most relevant topics, like aesthetics, violence, cosmology, rites de passage, and the relationship with theater, performance, and art.

Assessment methods and assessment criteria:

A final take-home exam about the course topics, with a value of 60%.

Participation in class and exposition of a relevant theme: 40%

Attendance is mandatory

Classes in period "Summer semester 2023/24" (in progress)

Time span: 2024-02-19 - 2024-06-16
Selected timetable range:
Navigate to timetable
Type of class:
Participatory lecture, 30 hours more information
Coordinators: Sergio Gonzalez Varela
Group instructors: Sergio Gonzalez Varela
Students list: (inaccessible to you)
Examination: Grading
Course dedicated to a programme:

4EU+Courses

Course descriptions are protected by copyright.
Copyright by University of Warsaw.
Krakowskie Przedmieście 26/28
00-927 Warszawa
tel: +48 22 55 20 000 https://uw.edu.pl/
contact accessibility statement USOSweb 7.0.3.0 (2024-03-22)