Ukrainian in business

general courses

Good knowledge of Ukrainian (C1).

Classroom

The aim of the subject is to discuss and analyze current trends in the development of business language in professional practice and improve the research workshop in this field, as well as provide students with specialist knowledge and terminology in the field of business (entrepreneurship, finance, banking, real estate). Level of proficiency according to CEFR - C1 +.

The material includes economic and commercial lexis, language analysis of selected documents, commercial terminology with elements of the bank, stock exchange and insurance market. Introduces the latest concepts in economics, economy and trade; registers and discusses current trends in the development of Ukrainian business language used in professional practice.

During the classes, students learn about the culture and specificity of language in the sphere of business, expand specialist vocabulary regarding economic and trade contacts with Ukrainian partners; enrich the already learned terminology from economic, commercial, banking, marketing and advertising on selected texts and specialist literature.

The course prepares you to work independently in the field of understanding, compiling and translating content-related texts from the commercial sector. For the purposes of the course, students independently arrange dictionaries of specialized terms.

The scope of content can be used as a basis for research in the field of translation, lexicography and influence on the choice of the subject of the thesis.

Student workload:

organized hours - 30 g.

preparation for each class - approx. 15 g.

Preparation for the exam - approx. 15 g.

Total: approx. 60 g.

Materiały podstawowe: przygotowane przez wykładowcę.

Literatura dodatkowa:

M. Zubkow, Suczasna ukrajinśka diłowa mowa, Charków 2003.

S. Hłuszczyk, O. Dyjak, S. Szewczyk, Suczasni diłowi papery, Kyjiw 2003.

Kultura fachowoho mowłennia, red. N. Barycz, Czerniwci 2006.

A.Zahnitko, Ukrajinśke diłowe mowłennia, Donećk 2004.

T. Czmut, H. Czajka, Etyka diłowoho spiłkuwannia, Kyjiw 2003.

S.Szewczuk, Ukrajinśke diłowe mowłennia, Kyjiw 2004.

S.Szewczuk, Służbowe łystuwannia, Kyjiw 1999.

Słowniki:

Uniwersalnyj dowidnyk-praktykum z diłowych paperiw, red. Ł. Pustowit, Kyjiw 1999.

Ekonomicznyj słownyk-dowidnyk, Kyjiw 1995.

Nowyj praktycznyj ekonomicznyj słownyk angło-ukrajinśkyj, ukrajinśko-anhlijśkyj, Ł. Herasymczuk, Kyjiw 2003,

Słownik biznesu polsko-angielsko-rosyjski, P. Kapusta, M. Chowaniec, Warszawa 2009,

Bankiwśka encykłopedija, Kyjiw1993.

Uniwersalnyj słownyk – encykłopedija, Kyjiw 2001.

S. Domagalski, Wielki słownik polsko-ukraiński i ukraińsko-polski z rozszerzoną terminologią współczesnego biznesu, Warszawa 2008.

The student knows in a deepened degree: the terminology and methodology of linguistic research, including lexicographical; translation theory and translation techniques in the field of specialized translations; key issues related to the development and functioning of modern Ukrainian language in the field of business, commerce and entrepreneurship.

Student is able to: properly choose sources, including business texts in the field of business and information derived from them (eg terms relevant to the field); use appropriate research methods and tools in the field of Ukrainian linguistics (including translation and lexicography); communicate on specialist topics with people related to the broadly understood field of business, commerce and entrepreneurship.

The subject ends with getting credit with a grade.

When issuing the final assessment, the following criteria apply:

- achieving the assumed learning outcomes covering all relevant aspects - 5.0 (very good grade)

- achieving the assumed learning outcomes covering all relevant aspects with a small number of errors or inaccuracies - 4.5 (good plus)

- achieving the assumed learning outcomes without taking into account some (less important) aspects - 4.0 (good grade)

- achievement of the assumed learning outcomes, omitting some important aspects and with significant inaccuracies - 3.5 (satisfactory plus)

- achievement of the assumed learning outcomes, omitting significant aspects or with serious inaccuracies - 3.0 (satisfactory plus)

- failure to achieve the expected learning outcomes - 2.0 (unsatisfactory)

The subject ends with a written exam, where the assessment criteria are presented in the form of interest thresholds (points obtained from the written test):

60% - 69% - 3 (satisfactory)

70% - 77% - 3+ (rated satisfactory plus)

78% - 85% - 4 (good)

86% - 91% - 4+ (good plus)

92% - 97% - 5 (very good)

98% -100% - 5! (Very good with an exclamation mark)