University of Warsaw - Central Authentication System
Strona główna

(in Polish) The Ethics of Consent

General data

Course ID: 3800-EC21-S-OG
Erasmus code / ISCED: 08.1 Kod klasyfikacyjny przedmiotu składa się z trzech do pięciu cyfr, przy czym trzy pierwsze oznaczają klasyfikację dziedziny wg. Listy kodów dziedzin obowiązującej w programie Socrates/Erasmus, czwarta (dotąd na ogół 0) – ewentualne uszczegółowienie informacji o dyscyplinie, piąta – stopień zaawansowania przedmiotu ustalony na podstawie roku studiów, dla którego przedmiot jest przeznaczony. / (0223) Philosophy and ethics The ISCED (International Standard Classification of Education) code has been designed by UNESCO.
Course title: (unknown)
Name in Polish: The Ethics of Consent
Organizational unit: Faculty of Philosophy
Course groups: General university courses in the humanities
ECTS credit allocation (and other scores): (not available) Basic information on ECTS credits allocation principles:
  • the annual hourly workload of the student’s work required to achieve the expected learning outcomes for a given stage is 1500-1800h, corresponding to 60 ECTS;
  • the student’s weekly hourly workload is 45 h;
  • 1 ECTS point corresponds to 25-30 hours of student work needed to achieve the assumed learning outcomes;
  • weekly student workload necessary to achieve the assumed learning outcomes allows to obtain 1.5 ECTS;
  • work required to pass the course, which has been assigned 3 ECTS, constitutes 10% of the semester student load.

view allocation of credits
Language: English
Type of course:

elective seminars
general courses

Prerequisites (description):

Successfully completed basic ethics course, command of English sufficient for reading assigned materials and participation in discussions in class.

Short description:

Consent is one of the key conditions of the ethical (and, often, legal) acceptability of acting for the benefit of others. It is a central idea of political legitimization in a democratic society, authorization in law and a central element of medical ethics. During the seminar key philosophical-anthropological and axiological prerequisites of consent will be discussed, as well as the limits of consent: what one is allowed to authorize others to do and what consent does not authorize. During the seminar we will discuss the normative foundations of consent (ideals, right, values, duties), its validity (form, scope, voluntariness, information, competencies of its parties), normative consequences (authorizations, entitlements, duties); we will also discuss such actions without consent as acts of paternalism, exploitation, deception, rape, and violence.

Full description:

Consent is one of the key conditions of the ethical (and, often, legal) acceptability of acting for the benefit of others. It is a central idea of political legitimization in a democratic society, authorization in law and a central element of medical ethics. During the seminar key philosophical-anthropological and axiological prerequisites of consent will be discussed, as well as the limits of consent: what one is allowed to authorize others to do and what consent does not authorize. During the seminar we will discuss the normative foundations of consent (ideals, right, values, duties), its validity (form, scope, voluntariness, information, competencies of its parties), normative consequences (authorizations, entitlements, duties); we will also discuss such actions without consent as acts of paternalism, exploitation, deception, rape, and violence.

Bibliography:

Wstępna lista lektur/A tentative reading list:

L. Alexander, "The Moral Magic of Consent (II)", Legal Theory 2, nr 3 (1996): 165-74

B. Berofsky, "Identification, the self, and autonomy", Social Philosophy and Policy 20, nr 2 (2003): 199-220

M.E. Bratman, "Autonomy and hierarchy", Social Philosophy and Policy 20, nr 2 (2003): 156-76

S. Buss, "Valuing Autonomy and Respecting Persons: Manipulation, Seduction, and the Basis of Moral Constraints", Ethics 115, nr 2 (2005): 195-235,

M.M. Dempsey "Victimless Conduct and the Volenti Maxim: How Consent Works", Criminal Law and Philosophy 7, nr 1 (2013): 11–27

T. Dougherty, "Yes Means Yes: Consent as Communication", Philosophy & Public Affairs 43, nr 3 (2015): 224-53

G. Dworkin, The theory and practice of autonomy, Cambridge studies in philosophy, (Cambridge ; New York: Cambridge University Press, 1988)

J. Feinberg, "Harm to others. The Moral Limits of the Criminal Law ", w: The Metaphysics of Death, red. J.M. Fischer (Stanford University Press, 1993)

F.M. Frohock, "Liberal Maps of Consent", Polity 22, nr 2 (1989): 231-52

H.M. Hurd, "The Moral Magic of Consent", Legal Theory 2, nr 02 (1996): 121-46

N.C. Manson, "Permissive consent: a robust reason-changing account", Philosophical Studies 173, nr 12 (2016): 3317-34

A.R. Maclean, "Now You See It, Now You Don’t: Consent And The Legal Protection Of Autonomy", Journal of Applied Philosophy 17, nr 3 (2000): 277-88

O. O'Neill, "Which are the offers you can't refuse?", w: Violence, Terrorism, and Justice, Cambridge Studies in Philosophy and Public Policy, red. C.W. Morris, R.G. Frey (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1991)

J. Raz, The morality of freedom, (Oxford Oxfordshire New York: Clarendon Press; Oxford University Press, 1986)

F.G. Miller, A. Wertheimer, The ethics of consent : theory and practice, (Oxford ; New York: Oxford University Press, 2010)

A. Wertheimer, "What Is Consent? And Is It Important?", Buffalo Criminal Law Review 3, nr 2 (2000): 557-83

Learning outcomes:

Knowledge. After completing the course the student knows:

- key problems and theoretical approaches to the questions of consent (K_W02, K_W03, K_W09)

- key normative aspects of consent (its foundations and consequences) (K_W02, K_W03, K_W09)

- the concept of consent and the associated theoretical difficulties (K_W02, K_W03, K_W09)

- main theoretical approaches to consent (K_W03, K_W09)

- influential publications on consent (K_W03, K_W09)

- links between classical and contemporary conceptions of consent (K_W02, K_W09)

Skills. After completing the course the student can

- critically analyse current philosophical ethics literature (K_U02, K_U15)

- identify and interpret key problems, theses, and arguments found in the literature on consent (K_U01, K_U15)

- formulates her/his own theoretical view of philosophical problems associated with the topic of consent (K_U13, K_U14, K_U15)

Social competencies. After completing the course the student can:

- critically evaluate their knowledge, information obtained (K_K01, K_K02)

- collaborate with others and take different roles in collaboration (K_K07)

- appreciate the significance of theoretical reflection on morals and for social practice (K_K02, K_K06, K_K07)

- diligently and responsibly develops the achievements of bioethics as a theoretical discipline and social practice (K_K06)

Assessment methods and assessment criteria:

- activity in class (including: attendance, knowledge of the literature assigned, participation in discussions) – 30% of grade

- preparation of a session report and its presentation in class – 30% of grade

- final essay on a topic discussed during the seminar– 40% of grade

Number of absences: 1

This course is not currently offered.
Course descriptions are protected by copyright.
Copyright by University of Warsaw.
Krakowskie Przedmieście 26/28
00-927 Warszawa
tel: +48 22 55 20 000 https://uw.edu.pl/
contact accessibility statement USOSweb 7.0.3.0 (2024-03-22)