On boredom
General data
Course ID: | 2500-PL-PS-FO-15 |
Erasmus code / ISCED: |
14.4
|
Course title: | On boredom |
Name in Polish: | O nudzie |
Organizational unit: | Faculty of Psychology |
Course groups: |
(in Polish) Fakultety ogólnoakademickie |
ECTS credit allocation (and other scores): |
3.00
|
Language: | Polish |
Prerequisites (description): | (in Polish) Wstęp wolny |
Short description: |
Boredom is the essence of life for many. Therefore is not worth being neglected as trivial problem of the immatured due to being young or immatured beside being old. The boredom is linked with serious life impairment referring to emotionality, identity, cognitive functioning, family life, occupational life, school life etc. (Is boredom potentally creative? Has boredom any bright side?) The lecture deals with the comprehensive discussion about the boredom. The definitions of boredom, its theories as well as the functions of boredom in our lives, the individual differences in boredom succeptibility, the environmental factors and boredom measurement comprise the lecture issues. |
Learning outcomes: |
K n o w l e d g e . Student knows the theories of boredom. Student understands the impact of boredom on different spheres of life. Student is familiar with different methods of measurement of the boredom and its components. S k i l l s . Student is able to make a critical reading of popular conceptions or informations about boredom with regard to scientific knowledge. S o c i a l c o m p e t e n c i e s . Not applicable. |
Classes in period "Winter semester 2023/24" (past)
Time span: | 2023-10-01 - 2024-01-28 |
Navigate to timetable
MO TU WYK
W TH FR |
Type of class: |
Lecture, 30 hours
|
|
Coordinators: | (unknown) | |
Group instructors: | Michał Chruszczewski | |
Students list: | (inaccessible to you) | |
Examination: |
Course -
Grading
Lecture - Grading |
|
Full description: |
Boredom is the essence of life for many. Therefore is not worth being neglected as trivial problem of the immatured due to being young or immatured beside being old. The boredom is linked with serious life impairment referring to emotionality, identity, cognitive functioning, family life, occupational life, school life etc. (Is boredom potentally creative? Has boredom any bright side?) The lecture deals with the comprehensive discussion about the boredom. The definitions of boredom, its theories as well as the functions of boredom in our lives, the individual differences in boredom succeptibility, the environmental factors and boredom measurement comprise the lecture issues. |
|
Bibliography: |
Do sprawdzianu wymagana jest znajomość w całości książki, która stanowi literaturę podstawową: Chruszczewski, M. H. (2020). Nuda. Ujęcie psychologiczne i humanistyczne. Warszawa: Wydawnictwa Uniwersytetu Warszawskiego. LITERATURA UZUPEŁNIAJĄCA Barbizet, J. (1958). Yawning. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry, 21, 3, 203–209. Bigelow, P. (1983). The ontology of boredom: a philosophical essay. Man and World, 16, 3, 251–265. Bizior-Dombrowska, M. (2016). Romantyczna nuda. Wielka nostalgia za niczym. Toruń: Wydawnictwo Naukowe Uniwersytetu Mikołaja Kopernika. Bench, S. W. i Lench, H. C. (2013). On the function of boredom. Behavioral Sciences, 3, 459–472. Brodski, J. (1996). Pochwała nudy. Kraków: Wydawnictwo Znak. Chruszczewski, M. H. (2017). Czas w nudzie. Psychologia Wychowawcza, 54, 12, 29–40. Eastwood, J. D., Frischen, A., Fenske, M. J. i Smilek, D. (2012). The unengaged mind: defining boredom in terms of attention. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7, 482–495. Elpidorou, A. (2018). The good of boredom. Philosophical Psychology, 31, 3, 323–351. Fahlman, S. A., Mercer-Lynn, K. B., Flora, D. B. i Eastwood, J. D. (2013). Development and validation of the Multidimensional State Boredom Scale. Assessment, 20, 1, 68‒85. Fahlman, S. A., Mercer, K. B., Gaskovski, P., Eastwood, A. E. i Eastwood, J. D. (2009). Does a lack of life meaning cause boredom? Results from psychometric, longitudinal, and experimental analyses. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 28, 3, 307–340. Farmer, R. i Sundberg, N. D. (1986). Boredom proneness – the development and correlates of a new scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 50, 1, 4–17. Finkielsztein, M. (2016). Nuda a wstręt. Przesyt, ennui i wstręt do życia. Stan Rzeczy. Teoria Społeczna. Europa Środkowo-Wschodnia, 2, 11, 60–72. Flakus, M. (2018). Wstępna charakterystyka psychometryczna polskiej adaptacji Skali Podatności na Nudę (BPS). Polskie Forum Psychologiczne, 23, 4, 783–802. Goetz, T., Frenzel, A. C., Hall, N. C., Nett, U. E., Pekrun, R. i Lipnevich, A. A. (2014). Types of boredom: an experience sampling approach. Motivation and Emotion, 38, 3, 401–419. Hunter, J. A., Abraham, E. H., Hunter, A. G., Goldberg, L. C. i Eastwood, J. D. (2016). Personality and boredom proneness in the prediction of creativity and curiosity. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 22, 48–57. Iso-Ahola, S. E. i Weissinger, E. (1990). Perceptions of boredom in leisure: conceptualization reliability, and validity of the Leisure Boredom Scale. Journal of Leisure Research, 22, 1, 1–17. Leong, F. T. i Schneller, G. R. (1993). Boredom proneness: temperamental and cognitive components. Personality and Individual Differences, 14, 1, 233–239. Maggini, C. (2005). Psychobiology of boredom. CNS Spectrums, 5, 8, 24–27. Mann, S. i Cadman, R. (2014). Does being bored make us more creative? Creativity Research Journal, 26, 2, 165–173. Mann, S. i Robinson, A. (2009). Boredom in the lecture theatre: an investigation into the contributors, moderators and outcomes of boredom amongst university students. British Educational Research Journal, 35, 2, 243–258. Markowski, M. P. (1999). L'ennui: ułamek historii. W: P. Czapliński i P. Śliwiński (red.), Nuda w kulturze (str. 290–316). Poznań: Dom Wydawniczy Rebis Sp. z o.o. O'Hanlon, J. F. (1981). Boredom: practical consequences and a theory. Acta Psychologica, 49, 1, 53–82. Pleskaczyńska, M. (2016). Filozoficzne paradoksy nudy. Stan Rzeczy. Teoria Społeczna. Europa Środkowo-Wschodnia, 2, 11, 22–38. Provine, R. R. (2005). Yawning. American Scientist, 93, 6, 532–539. Przychodniak, Z. (1997). O czczości uwag kilka. Prolegomena do badań nad przeoczonym problemem historii teatru. W: D. Ratajczakowa i B. Judkowiak (red.), Igraszki trafu, teatru i tematów. Drobne scherza i scherzanda naukowe (str. 7–16). Poznań: Wydawnictwo „Polinfo”. Robinson, W. P. (1975). Boredom at school. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 45, 2, 141–152. Smith, R. P. (1981). Boredom: a review. Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 23, 3, 329–340. Svendsen, L. (2017). Boredom and the meaning of life. W: M. E. Gardiner i J. J. Haladyn (red.), Boredom Studies Reader. Frameworks and Perspectives (str. 205–215). London-New York, NY: Routledge. Taylor & Francis Group. Szmidt, J. K. (2013). Nuda jako problem pedagogiczny. Teraźniejszość – Człowiek – Edukacja, 16, 3, 55–69. Tilburg, W. A. P., van i Igou, E. R. (2012). On boredom: lack of challenge and meaning as distinct boredom experiences. Motivation and Emotion, 36, 2, 181–194. Vodanovich, S. J. i Watt, J. D. (2015). Self-report measures of boredom: an updated review of the literature. The Journal of Psychology, 150, 2, 196–228. Walusinski, O. (2010). Historical perspectives. Frontiers of Neurology and Neuroscience, 28, 1–21. Watt, J. D. i Ewing, J. E. (1996). Toward the development and validation of a measure of sexual boredom. The Journal of Sex Research, 33, 1, 57–66. Wemelsfelder, F. (2005). Animal boredom: understanding the tedium of confined lives. W: F. D. McMillan (red.), Mental health and well-being in animals (str. 79–92). Ames, IA: Blackwell Publishing Professional. Węcławski, T. (1999). Nuda wieczna? W: P. Czapliński i P. Śliwiński (red.), Nuda w kulturze (str. 13–24). Poznań: Dom Wydawniczy Rebis Sp. z o.o. |
Copyright by University of Warsaw.