University of Warsaw - Central Authentication System
Strona główna

Freedom of Speech in the U.S. Supreme Court Jurisprudence

General data

Course ID: 2200-1CV09-OG
Erasmus code / ISCED: 10.0 Kod klasyfikacyjny przedmiotu składa się z trzech do pięciu cyfr, przy czym trzy pierwsze oznaczają klasyfikację dziedziny wg. Listy kodów dziedzin obowiązującej w programie Socrates/Erasmus, czwarta (dotąd na ogół 0) – ewentualne uszczegółowienie informacji o dyscyplinie, piąta – stopień zaawansowania przedmiotu ustalony na podstawie roku studiów, dla którego przedmiot jest przeznaczony. / (0421) Law The ISCED (International Standard Classification of Education) code has been designed by UNESCO.
Course title: Freedom of Speech in the U.S. Supreme Court Jurisprudence
Name in Polish: Freedom of Speech in the U.S. Supreme Court Jurisprudence
Organizational unit: Faculty of Law and Administration
Course groups: Courses in foreign languages
General university courses
General university courses in Faculty of Law and Administration
General university courses in the social sciences
ECTS credit allocation (and other scores): 4.00 Basic information on ECTS credits allocation principles:
  • the annual hourly workload of the student’s work required to achieve the expected learning outcomes for a given stage is 1500-1800h, corresponding to 60 ECTS;
  • the student’s weekly hourly workload is 45 h;
  • 1 ECTS point corresponds to 25-30 hours of student work needed to achieve the assumed learning outcomes;
  • weekly student workload necessary to achieve the assumed learning outcomes allows to obtain 1.5 ECTS;
  • work required to pass the course, which has been assigned 3 ECTS, constitutes 10% of the semester student load.

view allocation of credits
Language: English
Type of course:

general courses

Mode:

Classroom

Full description:

Classes held once a week for 90 minutes are skills oriented. Therefore presence (three absences allowed only) and active participation in class discussion are essential to complete the course successfully, although a written exam, i.e. a short essay, will be necessary to get a final grade.

The course is designed as an introduction to common law. The very first freedoms of the First Amendment to the US Constitutions give only an occasion to discuss the jurisprudence and methods of the US Supreme Court.

1. Right to shocking speech? (Texas v. Johnson, 1989, and Snyder v. Phelps, 2011)

2. The history of free expression under common law. Clear and present danger? (Schenck v. US, 1919, and Abrams v. US, 1919).

3. The ‘Red Scare’ as witch-hunt? (after World War I: Gitlow v. New York, 1925, and Whitney v. California, 1927; after World War II: Dennis v. US, 1951)

4. Freedom of incitement or sedition. (Brandenburg v. Ohio, 1969, and United States v. Williams, 2008)

5. Expression that provokes a hostile audience reaction. (Chaplinsky v. New Hampshire, 1942, and Feiner v. New York, 1951)

6. Nazis in a Jewish town – the Skokie controversy.

7. The funeral of hate speech? (R.A.V. v. City of St. Paul, Minn., 1992)

8. Dangerous disclosures and the national security – the Pentagon Papers. (New York Times Co. v. US; US v. Washington Post Co., 1971)

9. Right to lie under free speech? (United States v. Alvarez, 2012)

10. Buffer zones against free speech? (Hill v. Colorado, 2000, and Mc Cullen v. Coakley, 2014)

11. Speech restrictions that “does not pass strict scrutiny, or intermediate scrutiny, or even the laugh test”. (Reed v. Town of Gilbert, Arizona, 2015; cf. Barr v. American Assn. of Political Consultants, 2020)

12. Internet as a new forum of speech. (Reno v. ACLU, 1997, and Ashcroft v. ACLU, 2002)

13. Threats on Facebook as protected free speech? (Elonis v. United States, 2015)

14. Car plates as a new forum for speech. (Pleasant Grove City v. Summum, 2009, and Walker v. Texas Div., Sons of Confederate Veterans, 2015)

15. Patent and Trademark law: fighting with immoral and scandalous matters or bad words? (Matal v. Tam, 2017, Iancu v. Brunetti, 2019)

Bibliography:

F. Longchamps de Berier, Textbook on the First Amendment. Freedom of Speech and Freedom of Religion, Kraków 2012.

Classes in period "Winter semester 2023/24" (past)

Time span: 2023-10-01 - 2024-01-28
Selected timetable range:
Navigate to timetable
Type of class:
Specialised lecture, 30 hours more information
Coordinators: Franciszek Longchamps de Berier
Group instructors: Franciszek Longchamps de Berier
Students list: (inaccessible to you)
Examination: Course - Grading
Specialised lecture - Grading

Classes in period "Winter semester 2024/25" (future)

Time span: 2024-10-01 - 2025-01-26
Selected timetable range:
Navigate to timetable
Type of class:
Specialised lecture, 30 hours more information
Coordinators: Franciszek Longchamps de Berier
Group instructors: Franciszek Longchamps de Berier
Students list: (inaccessible to you)
Examination: Course - Grading
Specialised lecture - Grading
Course descriptions are protected by copyright.
Copyright by University of Warsaw.
Krakowskie Przedmieście 26/28
00-927 Warszawa
tel: +48 22 55 20 000 https://uw.edu.pl/
contact accessibility statement USOSweb 7.0.3.0 (2024-03-22)